Comments on: Pill to “Cure” Textured Hair?

By: hyspin

hyspin — Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:51:30 +0000

NaturaIdoll I hear there believed to be a cure for both actually not totally for Cancer but certain ones. But they don’t wan’t use the cancer cure because pharmaceuticals make too much money. As for AIDS they think it would be best not to because it will not fix people bad behaviours that cause the disease to spread and also as slight population control.

By: naturaldoll

naturaldoll — Tue, 22 Nov 2011 02:41:25 +0000

jesus take the wheel. And yet we still don’t have cures for CANCER or AIDS.

By: SaraNoH

SaraNoH — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 21:07:28 +0000

wow, people really need to calm down and get off their high-horses. Stop taking this article so damn personally and playing the victim that Big Bad Society is saying curly hair is disgusting/ugly/wrong etc. The author of this article most likely purposely chose the words, “Cure” to spark heated discussion because, hey, this is a BIASED website (not saying that’s a bad thing). I for one think it’s kind of cool what modern medicine can do. A pill is just the same as using relaxers etc to straighten hair. Maybe I want straight hair one day but don’t want to use a flat iron. Ever think about that?

By: Celadon

Celadon — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 04:46:08 +0000

That’s the thing, with the advent of better products I’ve gone from relaxing to loving my natural curls; my hair has never been healthier. I’d rather take a supplement to make my natural hair stronger, shinier and healthier, but straighter? No, not when there are so many great products out there. I use WEN and Jonathan Torch’s Extenzz, with a little Body Shop Body Butter I now have the hair I’ve wanted all my life. I would take a pill to get rid of gray, or to banish frizz but leave my curls alone.

By: Radicalgnome2

Radicalgnome2 — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 23:34:07 +0000

“Cure” my hair? Since when was there something wrong with it? It’s scary what science can do nowadays. I’m sure that kind of pill would totally mess up your body. I’m not really a religious person, but I do believe you were born with the right type of hair for you. In the same way your skin tone compliments your eyes, your natural hair will compliment your face. I guess people tend to want what they don’t have, but society always seems to be pushing straight hair. Strange how things can change over time… up until recent history curls were considered the most beautiful type of hair you could have.

By: MsCurlyDoc

MsCurlyDoc — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:50:45 +0000

I find this to be another example of our society putting this idea in our heads that something is wrong with what you were born with. For those who want this that is your own thought. However you should really examine the reason. Is it because of your hair or is it because of what society has told you about your hair. For those of us that love our hair just the way it is let continue this road of love for your hair. Hell love for you and what you were born with is the best way to be.

By: The Curly Hair Gene: Fact or Fiction?

The Curly Hair Gene: Fact or Fiction? — Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:09:29 +0000

[...] about whether or not textured hair is a “genetic defect,” and whether or not the so-called “curly hair gene” can be manipulated to produce straight hair. Naturally, we decided to call on some scientists to [...]

By: Saturday Surfing

Saturday Surfing — Fri, 04 Jun 2010 06:29:09 +0000

[...] Would you take a pill to “cure” your curly hair? — Naturally Curly [...]

By: voidofidea

voidofidea — Thu, 22 Apr 2010 05:23:07 +0000

This right here proves that people with straight hair are superior than people with curly hair. Why else would they be investing research into it?

By: Don’t Take a Pill! Get a Brazilian Blowout™ for Improved Hair Texture | A Mom in Red High Heels - Beauty & Style Tips for Moms

Mon, 12 Apr 2010 05:23:09 +0000

[...] that could make straightening irons and the like a thing of the past, most curlies who took NaturallyCurly’s online poll said no [...]