You have to remember, since we are behind a computer or phone screen, I am going to take something and have to assume that. That is fine with being straightforward but I felt that it was the way you wrote it. It was as if everything I said was being ignorant. I personally felt strongly when I read the post (about her boss), because it is so sad that girls have to feel that way.
Thank you for responding in a nice manner and I do appreciate what you wrote. In response to the second post I wrote underneath my longer one, I was referring to people thinking and I guess passively saying, negative connotations towards grooming. In my head I figured her boss saw volume hair + frizz = un-groomed curly hair compared to groomed straight hair. That is why I mentioned he must prefer straight hair. I feel it is a safe assumption because there have been numerous stories on top CEO women with curly hair who had to sue for discrimination because other members had negative comments about curly hair. Obviously it was more extreme but I feel that people start off with little comments such as this young women's boss and then it begins to escalate. I feel bad writing too out of the topic from this young woman's post, but that is my opinion and I apologize for blowing up her post and what happened to her.