View Single Post
Old 10-27-2013, 01:42 PM   #17
Firefox7275
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chupie View Post
I don't understand why it would be called leave in right in the bottle if they didn't mean conditioner. Otherwise every styling thing is a leave in. Insure get confused.
Because presumably leave in conditioner is a phrase that helps sell products, and because KCKT are not a Deva/ CG brand so they don't have to follow the same naming system. To me KCKT is a leave in detangler.

I've seen plenty of products with the most nonsensical names and straplines, from wall-to-wall oils and butters that are allegedly 'moisturising' to basic conditioners that are allegedly 'repairing' (no protein or anything else noteworthy). Unless terms are regulated by law in the US/ EU advertisers will be economical with the truth.
__________________
2a-2c, medium texture, porous/ colour treated. Three years CG, growing out mechanical and chemical damage = breakage and very high porosity. Past armpit length heading for waist.

CO-wash: Inecto coconut
Treatments: Komaza Matani, coconut oil, Hairveda Sitrinillah
Leave in: Fructis Sleek & Shine (old), Gliss ultimate volume, Inecto argan
Styler: Umberto Giannini jelly, Boots Essentials gel
Experimenting with: going back to basics
Firefox7275 is offline   Reply With Quote