Go Back   CurlTalk > Hair > 3

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-12-2006, 11:00 AM   #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 667
Default Curls Milkshake vs. Curl Junkie leave-ins (also posted on 4a

I absolutely love this Curls Milkshake. It's the perfect consistency and I don't have as much shrinkage with it. What I'm wondering is if those of you who have tried both the Milkshake any of the CJ leave-ins prefer one over the other?

PS. I haven't tried the CJ leave-ins because they don't offer samples. I've only tried the Banana Hibiscus Deep Fix and I LOVE it.

Thanks.
__________________
Currently using:

Poo: CON Sulfate Free poo
Rinse out: Tresemme Naturals
Leave-in: CJAOO Daily Cond
Styler: KCCC sparingly and Ampro Olive Oil Gel where needed
DT: KBB Lucious Locks Mask + EVOO/Avocado
keepitmovin2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2006, 03:28 PM   #2
 
redcelticcurls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,014
Send a message via Yahoo to redcelticcurls
Default Re: Curls Milkshake vs. Curl Junkie leave-ins (also posted o

Quote:
Originally Posted by keepitmovin
I absolutely love this Curls Milkshake. It's the perfect consistency and I don't have as much shrinkage with it. What I'm wondering is if those of you who have tried both the Milkshake any of the CJ leave-ins prefer one over the other?

PS. I haven't tried the CJ leave-ins because they don't offer samples. I've only tried the Banana Hibiscus Deep Fix and I LOVE it.

Thanks.
I'm a 3B, so I'm not sure how much this will help, but I've tried both. For me, the CJ gave me more definition, and it did give me shrinkage, which I wanted. I'm not sure if it will do the same for a 3C. I seem to need more milkshake than CJ, but the CJ does a good job of moisturizing, it's cg friendly, and it's colorsafe. The smell reminds me of cake with vanilla frosting. The consistency of the CJ is much thicker, it's a thick cream, abut the consistency of a rich body lotion.
__________________
Kiva! Microfinance works.

Med/Coarse, porous curly.
redcelticcurls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2006, 10:16 PM   #3
 
Suburbanbushbabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 16,020
Default

I'm having deja vu with this question for some reason....

I use both. CJ's H&B leave-in/fine, I use as a leave-in on wet hair. Milkshake I use as a styler. The CJ moistens, softens, detangles and elongates with very little hold. The Milkshake smooths, defrizzes, re-defines my day old (or 2-3 day old) curls. I have added a smidge of the CJ and smoothed it on my hair and that works too. These are both HG products for me.
__________________
My blog - http://suburbanbushbabe.wordpress.com/
My FOTKI - http://whatsnew.fotki.com/suburbanbushbabe/


Playing with my hair is a hobby. Fluffy, fine natural 4a. Goal= Healthy, beautiful hair that retains its length.
Quote:
Hear that crash? It's me falling off the CG wagon.
Suburbanbushbabe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2006, 09:17 AM   #4
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 667
Default

Thanks ladies for your comments. I can't give up the milkshake as a leave-in, it's not a HG, but I wanted to know others' opions on whether the CJ leave-ins are worth it, comparatively speaking.
__________________
Currently using:

Poo: CON Sulfate Free poo
Rinse out: Tresemme Naturals
Leave-in: CJAOO Daily Cond
Styler: KCCC sparingly and Ampro Olive Oil Gel where needed
DT: KBB Lucious Locks Mask + EVOO/Avocado
keepitmovin2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2011 NaturallyCurly.com