US Weekly calls Viola Davis' stunning Oscar look "wigless"

Jonnice · 02-26-2012, 07:37 PM

Write US Weekly and let them know own ow ignorant and insensitive they are. To call Viola wigless for rocking her beautiful natural hair, so tasteless.

The title and link is below. Blow up their Twitter, Facebook, and comment under the article.

Viola Davis Flaunts Cleavage, Goes Wigless at Oscars

Read more: Viola Davis Flaunts Cleavage, Goes Wigless at Oscars - UsMagazine.com

Saila · 02-26-2012, 07:59 PM

Ohhh, nice hair! She looks great.

I'm sorry though, I don't understand - why/how is this offensive? She is indeed not wearing a wig. The article is mostly talking about how great she looks, they didn't say it like it was a bad thing - unless I'm missing something?

Quote:

She ditched her wig, going for a cropped, curly hairstyle

I mean, that's what she did, right?

murrrcat · 02-26-2012, 08:12 PM

who cares about her hair....what about them beast arms!?!?

Every time I see a photo of her, thats all I can stare out they're amazing!!!!!

wild~hair · 02-26-2012, 08:20 PM

It sounds like she usually wears a wig, no? If this is a departure for her, to go natural, it's not offensive to me they stated the facts of it and then say she looks great. Which she does. And I agree with the poster earlier, she has killer arms. As someone coming up on 46 in a few years, I'm inspired!

ChantelleMarie · 02-27-2012, 05:33 AM

On a side note, she looks absolutely fabulous with her natural hair. I love the color, too!

Here's another article:
Viola Davis Wears Her Natural Hair At The 2012 Oscars (PHOTO, POLL)

Happy that 75% of people polled prefer her hair natural!

3c4d7zwhatevs · 02-27-2012, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wild~hair

It sounds like she usually wears a wig, no? If this is a departure for her, to go natural, it's not offensive to me they stated the facts of it and then say she looks great. Which she does. And I agree with the poster earlier, she has killer arms. As someone coming up on 46 in a few years, I'm inspired!

to the bold: yes, she does wear a wig usually, which is quite obvious. She herself mentioned that her husband has asked her to "take off the wig" when she is not acting. she has admitted it and admitted that she feels powerful not wearing it, as she has done often of late.

I don't see where the offense lies here. She was, indeed, wigless yesterday, and in the LA Times, and at the Essence luncheon on Friday.

So, should we also protest People Magazine and Yahoo! for reporting similarly? And should we also protest the many blogs who have metioned it and referred to it positively?

AmberBrown · 02-27-2012, 11:55 AM

This is weird...