So if you're not stalking, don't have a vendetta, then what is this & why did you post on both threads about such?You may want to read through my posts for a chronology. I have not looked at or posted on this board for several years. CurliLocks personally attacked me on the Non-hair discussion forum, and I responded to her comments there, defending myself. I then replied to curlsgirl's post here, which quoted a RC employee who made a misleading claim. I corrected it, and Curlilocks replied to my post here.Is this stalking perhaps? Too bad you can't get a RO here.Seriously, let it go. You must have your computer set with an alarm for the word "peroxide" and my posts.
Sounds like a vendetta.
If you think it is better to make misleading claims [which could potentially harm someone who is allergic to hydrogen peroxide] than to defend oneself when attacked and to provide information about a product's ingredients, then that's your right, but the accusation that I've been stalking CurliLocks is ludicrous. Had I been stalking CurliLocks' posts, I'd have returned to nc.com long ago to point out her misleading claims.
And if you're not stalking, don't have a vendetta, & haven't been around in years, then how did you happen upon the linked thread & this thread?
Why do you or don't you respond to certain posters?Yep, it was about how Robert Craig color contains sodium perborate, which releases hydrogen peroxide when mixed with water. I pointed out that it's misleading to claim that RC color doesn't contain peroxide for this reason. While I was still active on naturallycurly.com [many years ago], CurliLocks stopped making this misleading claim, but I see that's not the case for her recent posts. Hence, my presence is unwanted. [Re: fig jam's hyperbolic claims, I'm just going to let bygones be bygones. People who know me can see those claims for what they are.]