Go Back   CurlTalk > Hair > Keratin Services and Treatment

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-19-2012, 08:28 AM   #1
 
zalim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 52
Default Texturizers versus keratin treatments

I am posting my question here because I think it got buried in the other thread....

Just wondering why the women here who want to loosen their curl pattern don't opt for a traditional texturizer/relaxer over a keratin treatment since texturizers have been around for 50 years and used much more widely.

Is there a difference in the result?
zalim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 01:17 PM   #2
 
BlackAngelPlayah's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,403
Default

In my opinion they are the same. Both damaging and all.


😜🍸Sent LIVE from my JPhone 4 using some CurlTalk app. 😜🍸

http://AfroCurls.wordpress.com
__________________
FroZen
BlackAngelPlayah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 11:20 PM   #3
 
Cupcake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 583
Default

I disagree. The cystine based treatments are temporary and don't break the bonds in your hair like traditional sodium/calcium/lithium/ hydroxide relaxers.

Keratin treatments can contain formeldahyde and product similar results as texturizers without nearly as much damage.
Cupcake is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Trending Topics[-]hide

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2011 NaturallyCurly.com