Renee Zellwegger's new figure

Renee was in London at the weekend promoting her new film. Press are speculating whether or not she's had her breasts enlarged. She certainly looks less emaciated than before.



Renee Zellweger shows off her fabulous new figure
By CLEMMIE MOODIE

Thanks partly to the dietary demands of playing Bridget Jones, Zellweger has varied between tubby and too thin.

But judging by her latest public appearance, Renee Zellweger has finally managed to get her figure precisely to her satisfaction.

The 37-year-old actress looked toned and glowing with health at the London premiere of her latest movie Miss Potter. And the most eyecatching aspect of her appearance was her dramatically enhanced cleavage.

Whether this was the result of the latest brassiere technology or (whisper it) breast implants, it was the hot topic among the crowd at the Odeon in Leicester Square last night.

The film is a biography of Beatrix Potter, giving Miss Zellweger another chance to show off her impressive English accent which featured in the two Bridget Jones films.

Thankfully, she did not have to repeat the yo-yo dieting that was necessary for the part of Bridget.

For the first movie in 2001, she piled on four stone to play Helen Fielding’s character who is constantly worrying about her weight.

Weeks after completing filming, she went on a crash diet and ended up thinner than when she started.

After agreeing to reprise her role in the 2004 sequel, she had to double her usual calorie intake, filling up on doughnuts and other fatty treats.

This was followed by another spell of weight loss, not helped by her disastrous marriage to country singer Kenny Chesney.

But at last Miss Zellweger can write in her diary: Looking v. v. good indeed.
Type 3b, Highlighted, Past Shoulders, Fine Texture, but very dense.
The article says she was "tubby" when she played in the Bridge Jones Diary movies? I thought she was gorgeous then (and quite busty then too).

When she was in Chicago, she was emaciated and it was so not attractive!
________
condos Pattaya

Last edited by goldencurly; 08-30-2011 at 09:28 AM.
she got her boobs done. they look good, but why give in to hollywood's standard of beauty. i mean, unlike many other actresses, she can rely on talent not her body. i just hope kate hudson doesn't get implants.
don't you know, goldencurly, anything over 110 pounds is tubby I do think she looks good, but i'm not sure if thats a boob job...they don't look THAT big!!
"Yo, James, i'm really happy for you, i'm gonna let you finish killing Bella in a minute, but Demetri was one of the best Trackers of ALL time!"

www.myspace.com/mimichica
It doesn't look like she had implants done, to me.

It just looks to me like she gained a little weight. I don't know, though... I'm not a very good judge of these things.

Sarah

"And death is at your doorstep
And it will steal your innocence
But it will not steal your substance
But you are not alone in this"

“My ability to turn good news into anxiety is rivaled only by my ability to turn anxiety into chin acne.” - Tina Fey
She had to gain weight for both Bridget Jones movies.....and of course, the boobs get bigger. THEN, of course they tape them up to make them even bigger.
Handle every stressful situation like a dog. If you can't eat it or hump it.....Piss on it and walk away.
Location - WI
I can't tell if it's implants or not.

I thought she looked painfully thin in Chicago. I suspect that because that was a major film right after Bridget Jones, and because there was so much ado about how "fat" she was in Bridget Jones (which is BS - I thought she looked totally hot) she felt like she needed to show that she wasn't "fat" and may have gone a little too far in losing weight for that film.
To Trenell, MizKerri and geeky:
I pray none of you ever has to live in a communist state.

Geeky is my hero. She's the true badass. The badass who doesn't even need to be a badass. There aren't enough O's in cool to describe her.
When she was in Chicago, she was emaciated and it was so not attractive!
I think am in the minority in that I DO think RZ is a cute girl in general --- but I agree, it was almost *painful* to look at her in that movie!

Anyway, boob job or not, she looks good in those pics!
I would've called her a bit tubby from being in Bridget Jones, and I'm nowhere near obsessed with thin Hollywood bodies.
~ the artist formerly known as babywavy ~

Please excuse any typos. For the time being, we are blaming it on my computer.
I don't think she's had implants.

First, when she gained weight for Bridget, her breasts were huge so it would stand to reason that if she gains a little weight, her breasts would be somewhat bigger.

Also, you can do a lot of amazing things with bras, tape, and those silicone inserts that go in your bra. I have a cousin who is flat, FLAT!!! but when she does pagents she looks like a porn star in the boob department.
I think she looks better in the second picture than the first. I've always liked her a little heavier; when she gets really thin she starts to look strange, IMO

I don't know if she's has her boobs done, I'd have to look at other skinny Renee pics to compare

I wanted to add, I think she's cute, she seems really polite and sweet in interviews (she was on Oprah once and Hugh Grant was a perfect ass to her and she handled it so well), and I loved her with brown hair.
They don't look fake to me, probably pushed up with cutlets or something. Since she doesn't look as skinny as before, it could just be from weight gain also.
I don't think she's had implants.

First, when she gained weight for Bridget, her breasts were huge so it would stand to reason that if she gains a little weight, her breasts would be somewhat bigger.
Originally Posted by CGNYC
I agree. Looks like she tends to put on weight there (lucky thing).

I also agree, though, that when she was in Chicago, she was pretty much boobless.
Previously Joy4ever.
Changed because the "number in place of a word" thing was bugging my no-longer-14-year-old self.
Before I comment, which is the before and which is the after picture?
I would've called her a bit tubby from being in Bridget Jones, and I'm nowhere near obsessed with thin Hollywood bodies.
Originally Posted by babywavy
ITA.
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 41,043
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 41,043
Before I comment, which is the before and which is the after picture?
Originally Posted by medussa
I thought the first one was after...
Originally Posted by WileECoyote - Daddy's grl
me too

You edited your post, so I agreed with you that I thought the first one was after

Trending Topics


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2011 NaturallyCurly.com