Go Back   CurlTalk > Life > Non-hair discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-16-2007, 05:00 PM   #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 42
Default Brad Pitt

Anyone notice how he seems to be looking more and more worn down or sad in his photos since the baby?

http://movies.aol.com/golden-globes/...t-dressed-2007
__________________
in the pipeline:
Goddess Hair & Skin Recipe Book
Emperor Hair & Skin Recipe Book

http://www.authorhouse.com/BookStore...x?bookid=41699
http://www.authorhouse.com/BookStore...x?bookid=41700
sohaircrazy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 05:06 PM   #2
 
gekko422's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,276
Default

Nope, not really seeing it. Not in the picture you posted anyway, he is clean shaven, tan, smiling, etc. The looking worn down could be due to the fact they have a new baby.
__________________
Democracy is not a spectator sport.

You know why pandas are endangered? Cause pandas ain't got no game.

Jesus loves you, but I'm his favorite.
gekko422 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 05:09 PM   #3
 
battinlash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,742
Default

Another Angelina bashing thread? Doesn't this get a little old?

Anyway, I don't see it. He looks like a man in his 40s who hasn't had plastic surgery. Kudos to him!
battinlash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 05:25 PM   #4
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,088
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tantrum
Anyway, I don't see it. He looks like a man in his 40s who hasn't had plastic surgery. Kudos to him!
Ditto
internetchick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 05:29 PM   #5
 
picklesgirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,369
Send a message via Yahoo to picklesgirl
Default

The big picture he still looks well hot the picture under it he still looks hot just like he's a little tired of standing there getting his picture taken.
__________________







picklesgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 05:39 PM   #6
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,292
Default

I took a look at the best/worst hair. The gals in curls labeled "worst", I didn't think look bad at all. I don't know what they're talking about!
lazy loops is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 05:41 PM   #7
 
Meghuney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 9,368
Send a message via AIM to Meghuney
Default Re: Brad Pitt

Quote:
Originally Posted by sohaircrazy
Anyone notice how he seems to be looking more and more worn down or sad in his photos and Angelina (since stealing married or engaged man #2) looks like the cheshire cat who ate the cream, th mouse and the golden ticket?


http://movies.aol.com/golden-globes/...t-dressed-2007

No, I think he looked great. And maybe she's smiling because she is happy.
Meghuney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 05:42 PM   #8
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,499
Default

He looks clean! I'm totally shocked since I've always thought he looks stinky. He actually reminded me of Robert Redford when I first looked at him. Reese Witherspoon's hair looks really pretty.
__________________
Location: Chicago

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"If you don't stand for something you will fall for anything."
ó Malcolm X
YolyC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 06:22 PM   #9
 
loosecurls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 4,175
Send a message via Yahoo to loosecurls
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YolyC
He looks clean! I'm totally shocked since I've always thought he looks stinky. He actually reminded me of Robert Redford when I first looked at him. Reese Witherspoon's hair looks really pretty.

ITA. I thought he & Angelina looked gorgeous---totally glamorous & happy.
__________________
Slinky's rule for NC.com:

I suppose I can't judge you because you married a serviceman and it is wartime. Boo hoo. You must be loney sitting at home with nothing else to do but pick on people. Why don't you go masterbate again?
loosecurls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 06:23 PM   #10
 
mrspoppers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 15,369
Default

I have no doubt that they are happy together for the time being. And beauty of it is that niether one of them believes in monogamy for life.
__________________
Quote:
When are women going to face the fact that they donít know their own bodies as well as men who have heard things?

Don Langrick
Bonsai Culturist
mrspoppers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 09:32 PM   #11
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 21,361
Default

DELETE!!!

I don't know why I am even getting involved in this conversation. I don't know these people!
CGNYC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 09:44 PM   #12
 
Agent Scarlett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 438
Send a message via Yahoo to Agent Scarlett
Default

Ya, I noticed it. At least in the photos I saw this morning, he just looked...older. He has the droopy eye lids thing going on. I don't know but I thought to myself, "Man, he looks old."
Agent Scarlett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 09:55 PM   #13
 
mayim's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CGNYC
Quote:
Another Angelina bashing thread? Doesn't this get a little old?
Actually, I never seen Angelina bashing threads, just threads in praise of Angelina where one or two brave souls pipe up and say, "hey, remember when we all knew her for being crazy as a &%$@#! house rat?"

Anyway, to me he always looks like he's probably a kind of stinky slacker stoner and she looks hard - like, prison hard. They clean up well and photoshop very nice but if they weren't famous and if we weren't all drowning in the hype, I don't think anyone would look twice at them on the street (other than to say, hey...who smells like patchouli and pot?). Which is not to say they aren't good looking, I just don't get the whole Super Couple thing.

And yeah, it's hard for me to really think of them as wonderful people considering she's gone from one married-to-someone-else guy after another and he cheated on his wife with her (read the article in Vogue, she puts it right out there). It's easy to be a "good person" when it comes to grand attention getting gestures that don't really personally cost you anything. It's much harder to do the right things in your day to day life and make the hard choices that aren't always so much fun.
what an excellent post!

m
__________________
coarse, thick 3a
modified cg







mayim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 10:02 PM   #14
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 21,361
Default

I was just going to delete it (and as I've been quoted, it's too late - oops!) because I don't know WHY I'm even getting involved in this conversation. The whole Saint Angelina thing makes no sense to me, I just don't get it. But I can TOTALLY beat that particular horse to death when I get started so lets just ignore me. We'll all be happier in the end.
CGNYC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 10:29 PM   #15
 
Rheanna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,440
Default

I totally agree CGNYC. I just don't get the hype either. I just now read what she said about their baby and how she loves the adopted kids more... Ugh.
__________________
Rheanna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 10:34 PM   #16
 
gekko422's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,276
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rheanna83
I totally agree CGNYC. I just don't get the hype either. I just now read what she said about their baby and how she loves the adopted kids more... Ugh.
I am not on the Angelina bandwagon, but that is not what she said and that is not what the article said.
__________________
Democracy is not a spectator sport.

You know why pandas are endangered? Cause pandas ain't got no game.

Jesus loves you, but I'm his favorite.
gekko422 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 10:39 PM   #17
 
yagottaloveyacurls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 12,146
Default

Quote:
It's much harder to do the right things in your day to day life and make the hard choices that aren't always so much fun.
ain't that the truth.
yagottaloveyacurls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 10:55 PM   #18
 
Rheanna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,440
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gekko422
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rheanna83
I totally agree CGNYC. I just don't get the hype either. I just now read what she said about their baby and how she loves the adopted kids more... Ugh.
I am not on the Angelina bandwagon, but that is not what she said and that is not what the article said.
Well perhaps she didn't come right out and say it...
Quote:
"I think I feel so much more for Mad and Z because they're survivors, they came through so much. Shiloh seemed so privileged from the moment she was born. I have less inclination to feel for her... I met my other kids when they were six months old, they came with personality. A newborn really is this... yes, a blob! But now she's starting to have a personality... I'm conscious that I have to make sure I don't ignore her needs just because I think the others are more vulnerable."
Maybe "feel so much more" isn't the same as "love more" but it is still a pretty ****ty thing to say, IMHO. How would you like to grow up and read that about yourself? Her bio kid can't help being born into rich parents any more than the other kids can help the situations they were born into. I think what she did (adopting those children) is an awesome thing, but saying that you feel more for them and calling your baby a "blob" seems a little... off... to me. Then again, what isn't a bit off about her? Making out with her brother is a bit off. Carrying around a vile of blood? That's a bit off too, so I guess to each their own.
__________________
Rheanna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 11:01 PM   #19
 
gekko422's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,276
Default

And if you read the rest of the thread, you will see that a lot of mothers feel the same way, where it takes time to bond with a baby, alot more time than when they are older and have more personality. Does that make them off too? Maybe she could have worded it better, but alot of women on this board agreed that they felt the same way.
__________________
Democracy is not a spectator sport.

You know why pandas are endangered? Cause pandas ain't got no game.

Jesus loves you, but I'm his favorite.
gekko422 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 11:05 PM   #20
 
Rheanna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,440
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gekko422
And if you read the rest of the thread, you will see that a lot of mothers feel the same way, where it takes time to bond with a baby, alot more time than when they are older and have more personality. Does that make them off too? Maybe she could have worded it better, but alot of women on this board agreed that they felt the same way.
I didn't read the thread... there was a thread here? I read it on the Superficial.

I'm sorry, her comment still seems off to me. I havent' been a mother, but I have been around plenty of newborns, and they aren't just personality-less "blobs." Above that though, I think what she said about feeling more for the other two is something that, while you may feel it, you should not say it... especially when it will be published everywhere and that child will read it years down the road. I really don't think that's a difficult idea to grasp. Again, how would you like to read that about yourself? I certainly would not. And also... c'mon, but those kids were a few months old. What happened to them, no doubt, was horrendous... but they wont' remember it. They will grow up spoiled, famous, rich Hollywood kids. They're not survivors in all senses of the word, really. It just doesn't sit well with me.

But again, everyone has a different opinion, so whatever. What was the thread here called... how old was it? I'll read it.
__________________
Rheanna is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Trending Topics[-]hide

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2011 NaturallyCurly.com