A Modest Proposal? Nope! GOP legislator actually wants parents to murder their kids

Like Tree18Likes
  • 1 Post By The New Black
  • 2 Post By Gretchen
  • 6 Post By Josephine
  • 4 Post By The New Black
  • 1 Post By yossarian
  • 3 Post By Eilonwy
  • 1 Post By B-Nessa11

And he's anti-choice, as if that comes as a surprise.
Link to article

The maintenance of civil order in society rests on the foundation of family discipline. Therefore, a child who disrespects his parents must be permanently removed from society in a way that gives an example to all other children of the importance of respect for parents. The death penalty for rebellioius [sic] children is not something to be taken lightly. The guidelines for administering the death penalty to rebellious children are given in Deut 21:18-21. ... Even though this procedure would rarely be used, if it were the law of land, it would give parents authority.
Originally Posted by Charlie Fuqua, from his book God's Law: The Only Political Solution


Last edited by Eilonwy; 10-09-2012 at 01:06 AM.
I don't understand how someone who's pro-life could seriously propose this. I don't understand how anyone could propose it. It must be satire. Or maybe he's just not too swift. (Ha! Get it...? Swift? nvm...)
murrrcat likes this.
No MAS.

I am the new Black.

"Hope the Mail are saving space tomorrow for Samantha Brick's reaction piece on the reactions to her piece about the reactions to her piece." ~ Tweet reposted by Rou.

http://www.youtube.com/user/Kimshi4242

http://www.tumblr.com/blog/kimshi4242
He sounds nuts.
curlypearl and moodydove like this.
Gretchen
NaturallyCurly.com co-founder
3A

You are beautiful!
I truly believe at least half if not most men who are anti choice are not really about preserving life but controlling a woman's body.
^^^Only the men?
No MAS.

I am the new Black.

"Hope the Mail are saving space tomorrow for Samantha Brick's reaction piece on the reactions to her piece about the reactions to her piece." ~ Tweet reposted by Rou.

http://www.youtube.com/user/Kimshi4242

http://www.tumblr.com/blog/kimshi4242
^^^Only the men?
Originally Posted by The New Black
Excellent point: what about all these women on the lunatic fringe? Michelle Bachmann, Sarah Palin, Virginia Foxx (no relation to Redd), Ann Coulter, Phyllis Schlafly (yes, she's still alive!, Michelle Malkin, Laura Ingraham etc.

The problem is religious fundamentalism, and its inherent chauvanism.
curlypearl likes this.
When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace. - Jimi
2c/3a, BSL, medium, low porosity
Low-poo: Bobeam and CV poo bars; Acure Argan Oil & Stem Cell
Conditioner: Acure Argan Oil & Stem Cell; Desert Essence Shea
Stylers: Sweet Curls Elixir Curl Cream; SM CES
PT: BASK Whiskey Soak
^^^Only the men?
Originally Posted by The New Black
Excellent point: what about all these women on the lunatic fringe? Michelle Bachmann, Sarah Palin, Virginia Foxx (no relation to Redd), Ann Coulter, Phyllis Schlafly (yes, she's still alive!, Michelle Malkin, Laura Ingraham etc.

The problem is religious fundamentalism, and its inherent chauvanism.
Originally Posted by yossarian
Welp, I'm pro-life too (anti-choice, as some of you call it). It has nothing to do with controlling anyone. I was pro-life before I became religious and my mother is pro-choice.
No MAS.

I am the new Black.

"Hope the Mail are saving space tomorrow for Samantha Brick's reaction piece on the reactions to her piece about the reactions to her piece." ~ Tweet reposted by Rou.

http://www.youtube.com/user/Kimshi4242

http://www.tumblr.com/blog/kimshi4242
Yes, I always miss the weird news. What are they drinking in AR?!

"In the depth of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay an invincible summer."

4a, mbl, low porosity, normal thickness, fine hair.
I truly believe at least half if not most men who are anti choice are not really about preserving life but controlling a woman's body.
Originally Posted by Josephine
In this case both the woman and the child are the man's property. The woman can't have an abortion because she's the vessel for the man's fetal property. And later, when the child property displeases the man, he can dispose of it.

eta:
I don't understand how someone who's pro-life could seriously propose this.
Originally Posted by The New Black
He's not pro-life. He just feels very strongly about property rights.
curlyarca, cosmicfly and thelio like this.

Last edited by Eilonwy; 10-09-2012 at 08:44 PM.
People need to stop using bible verses as a way to justify dumbazz views.

Sent from my Desire HD using CurlTalk App
thelio likes this.
Who's My Hair?
3c/4a-b looking stuff lol
BC- May 16, 2010
Why I chopped: heat damage/breakage
Luv'd my permed hair I just didnt take care of it.
LUVVV my natural hair!!!

Trending Topics


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2011 NaturallyCurly.com