10-18-2012, 12:29 PM
|
#162
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 16,546
|
here's why the "binder" comment was REALLY offensive:
Romney's 'binders full of women
...(David) Berstein (writer for the Boston Phoenix) reported that a bipartisan women’s group called MassGAP put together a list of strong female candidates for government positions, and presented it to Romney after he became governor. He didn’t go looking for one; there was no “recruiting effort” on his part, as he claimed in the debate. And while Romney did flip through the “binder” and hire a number of women for his administration, The Phoenix story says that they were given departments and agencies that weren’t priorities for him – and the percentage of women holding senior positions in his government declined overall while he was in office.
But as an Atlantic story also pointed out this morning, that’s really not what makes his comment so off-putting. It’s the notion that Romney needed “a binder” in the first place to find qualified women in his state to hire - that he didn’t know any coming into office and apparently, hadn’t consulted with any during his campaign, and needed to be reminded of their existence after his election. The suggestion then is that hiring women was a checklist requirement to be covered off for political purposes – rather than because these qualified candidates had merit on their own.
__________________
Follow me on Twitter, I post daily makeup deals!
Little Mother of all the Roaches, President-for-Life of the MAC Harlots!
|
|
|