What is your identity? With which group(s) do you identify?

Like Tree69Likes

I am weird. I am just "me". I didn't fit into any cliques in school at all and still do not. I am a nerdy, smartazz, artzish woman who is married with kids and a bazillion pets. When I think of myself these are the words that come to mind:

independent
creative
maker
care-giver
mom
wife
daughter
aunt
artist
knitter
gardener
craftsman
bookworm
outdoorsy
and of course: weird
I wonder if men were asked the same question if they would feel the need to identify as "Man". Most of the replies listed being a "woman". Sort of like how it seems like most people don't need to identify as being white. Or how ( I don't think) any heterosexuals identified as such while some homosexuals did. I find that interesting! I guess some things are considered "default" to the point where they don't need to be distinguished and not having to worry about that part of your identity be as much of a heavy influence on your life in a positive or negative way.
^ ya, I think what 'identifies' you would be what stands out, or separates you from the majority. It makes you you bc its less common. I wouldn't identify myself as someone with hair, or someone who drives a car, while, say, NetG may identify herself as a horseback rider.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using CurlTalk App
NetG likes this.
I wonder if men were asked the same question if they would feel the need to identify as "Man". Most of the replies listed being a "woman". Sort of like how it seems like most people don't need to identify as being white. Or how ( I don't think) any heterosexuals identified as such while some homosexuals did. I find that interesting! I guess some things are considered "default" to the point where they don't need to be distinguished and not having to worry about that part of your identity be as much of a heavy influence on your life in a positive or negative way.
Originally Posted by greenjumper


Exactly. I think it's like that for any elevated default group. White/male/hetero seems to be the American default and folks in those categories probably don't feel the need to ID as white/male/hetero. They just ARE those things unless otherwise noted. I would also put christian in that category, but I noticed a lot of christians ID'd themselves as such. To me, it's the default, which is why I ID as non-theist.
murrrcat and wavyblonde like this.
I wonder if men were asked the same question if they would feel the need to identify as "Man". Most of the replies listed being a "woman". Sort of like how it seems like most people don't need to identify as being white. Or how ( I don't think) any heterosexuals identified as such while some homosexuals did. I find that interesting! I guess some things are considered "default" to the point where they don't need to be distinguished and not having to worry about that part of your identity be as much of a heavy influence on your life in a positive or negative way.
Originally Posted by greenjumper
Heterosexual women will identify as wives/mothers though, and many of us did (or girlfriend.) Of course, homosexual women can be all those things too, but I know for me as a heterosexual woman, the act of conceiving, carrying, bearing my children and raising them with my husband is very much a part of my sexuality and my identity.
Get used to me. Black, confident, cocky; my name, not yours; my religion, not yours; my goals, my own; get used to me. -Muhammad Ali











I wonder if men were asked the same question if they would feel the need to identify as "Man". Most of the replies listed being a "woman". Sort of like how it seems like most people don't need to identify as being white. Or how ( I don't think) any heterosexuals identified as such while some homosexuals did. I find that interesting! I guess some things are considered "default" to the point where they don't need to be distinguished and not having to worry about that part of your identity be as much of a heavy influence on your life in a positive or negative way.
Originally Posted by greenjumper


Exactly. I think it's like that for any elevated default group. White/male/hetero seems to be the American default and folks in those categories probably don't feel the need to ID as white/male/hetero. They just ARE those things unless otherwise noted. I would also put christian in that category, but I noticed a lot of christians ID'd themselves as such. To me, it's the default, which is why I ID as non-theist.
Originally Posted by RedCatWaves
I don't think Christianity is a default (for one thing, it's way more diverse in meaning than "male" or "white.") I think Christians who are the "right" kind certainly enjoy privilege as compared to others, but it's not something you just ARE. Practising Christians very consciously integrate their faith into all aspects of their life and adopt a specific worldview, so it's always something of which they are aware. Marginal Christians who may say they are Christian because they celebrate Christmas, go to church once or twice a year etc. might see it as a default or something they just are, but not those who are very involved with their faith.
spiderlashes5000 likes this.
Get used to me. Black, confident, cocky; my name, not yours; my religion, not yours; my goals, my own; get used to me. -Muhammad Ali











I wonder if men were asked the same question if they would feel the need to identify as "Man". Most of the replies listed being a "woman". Sort of like how it seems like most people don't need to identify as being white. Or how ( I don't think) any heterosexuals identified as such while some homosexuals did. I find that interesting! I guess some things are considered "default" to the point where they don't need to be distinguished and not having to worry about that part of your identity be as much of a heavy influence on your life in a positive or negative way.
Originally Posted by greenjumper


Exactly. I think it's like that for any elevated default group. White/male/hetero seems to be the American default and folks in those categories probably don't feel the need to ID as white/male/hetero. They just ARE those things unless otherwise noted. I would also put christian in that category, but I noticed a lot of christians ID'd themselves as such. To me, it's the default, which is why I ID as non-theist.
Originally Posted by RedCatWaves
I don't think Christianity is a default (for one thing, it's way more diverse in meaning than "male" or "white.") I think Christians who are the "right" kind certainly enjoy privilege as compared to others, but it's not something you just ARE. Practising Christians very consciously integrate their faith into all aspects of their life and adopt a specific worldview, so it's always something of which they are aware. Marginal Christians who may say they are Christian because they celebrate Christmas, go to church once or twice a year etc. might see it as a default or something they just are, but not those who are very involved with their faith.
Originally Posted by Amneris
I agree, I think religion is more of a choice and it is one that is very emotional, spiritual, and rational for many who are deeply involved with their faith or who choose to not follow any religion. I think that is why most people identify as whatever religion, or lack thereof, they are regardless of whether they are the majority/privileged group. Religion is also a group that has more movement while sex, race, and orientation (allowing for the fact that people are on a spectrum) don't for the most part. I don't see Christianity as purely default but I do know that as someone from the United States it is an easy assumption to make since it is the most popular religion here which is why to non-Christians it may hold a default status or quality.

I still think that is the reason that people didn't identify as being heterosexual. Wife and mother are usually choices (with varying degrees of societal pressures). I wouldn't consider them "default", hence the need for them to be pointed out over heterosexuality. However, I do see why you pointed them out as being related to sexuality. If I were a wife or a mother I would definitely point those things out!
Amneris and murrrcat like this.
I wonder if men were asked the same question if they would feel the need to identify as "Man". Most of the replies listed being a "woman". Sort of like how it seems like most people don't need to identify as being white. Or how ( I don't think) any heterosexuals identified as such while some homosexuals did. I find that interesting! I guess some things are considered "default" to the point where they don't need to be distinguished and not having to worry about that part of your identity be as much of a heavy influence on your life in a positive or negative way.
Originally Posted by greenjumper
Well you're going to identify most with what people point out to you or how you're always reminded that you are different/not part of the status quo.

For me out of all the different identities i have, being female sticks out the most(it cross all races, religions, ages, personalities, etc). Especially since I'm in a male dominated career and apparently I'm not typically feminine is certain ways.
I wonder if men were asked the same question if they would feel the need to identify as "Man". Most of the replies listed being a "woman". Sort of like how it seems like most people don't need to identify as being white. Or how ( I don't think) any heterosexuals identified as such while some homosexuals did. I find that interesting! I guess some things are considered "default" to the point where they don't need to be distinguished and not having to worry about that part of your identity be as much of a heavy influence on your life in a positive or negative way.
Originally Posted by greenjumper
Heterosexual women will identify as wives/mothers though, and many of us did (or girlfriend.) Of course, homosexual women can be all those things too, but I know for me as a heterosexual woman, the act of conceiving, carrying, bearing my children and raising them with my husband is very much a part of my sexuality and my identity.
Originally Posted by Amneris
Soo...I definitely understand identifying yourself as a mother but I don't understand the wife part. Is it really all that different?? I would never identify myself as being a gf, even when I was in a really long relationship.
I identify myself as a partner. Thats part of who I am. I make decisions and live my life based on the relationship I share with my partner. Thats very much part of who I am. I also know there are subtle differences in myself based on who I am with. Different people bring out different parts of my personality.

I can only come up with

Woman
Mother - particularly SAHM
Partner
Avid reader
Lover of music



I define myself by the above, as well as spiritual, 'unfinished', and the death of my father mold me at the moment.


I can't think of anything else that stands out, except I do identify as an introvert. I like to avoid most social situations and I like to be with myself. That very much molds who I am.

I guess I group my identity and my current defining emotions together.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using CurlTalk App
NetG likes this.
I wonder if men were asked the same question if they would feel the need to identify as "Man". Most of the replies listed being a "woman". Sort of like how it seems like most people don't need to identify as being white. Or how ( I don't think) any heterosexuals identified as such while some homosexuals did. I find that interesting! I guess some things are considered "default" to the point where they don't need to be distinguished and not having to worry about that part of your identity be as much of a heavy influence on your life in a positive or negative way.
Originally Posted by greenjumper
Well you're going to identify most with what people point out to you or how you're always reminded that you are different/not part of the status quo.

For me out of all the different identities i have, being female sticks out the most(it cross all races, religions, ages, personalities, etc). Especially since I'm in a male dominated career and apparently I'm not typically feminine is certain ways.
Originally Posted by Josephine
I agree. I almost put something to that effect in my explanation post back on page 2, that a lot of people's identities may be with groups who are often persecuted or marginalized.
No MAS.

I am the new Black.

"Hope the Mail are saving space tomorrow for Samantha Brick's reaction piece on the reactions to her piece about the reactions to her piece." ~ Tweet reposted by Rou.

http://www.youtube.com/user/Kimshi4242

http://www.tumblr.com/blog/kimshi4242
^^ I agree, which is why white males don't need to identify as such because no one ever refers to them as part of a group. They're just individuals.

Must be nice.
curlypearl and greenjumper like this.
Last relaxer: 8.4.10
BC: 9.6.11

when will your favs?

^^ I agree, which is why white males don't need to identify as such because no one ever refers to them as part of a group. They're just individuals.

Must be nice.
Originally Posted by annabananalise
LoL!

But someone said what really defines us is what sets us apart. Well. I guess mine would be I care about others. Many have stopped( or never did) to do so. When I do things for others I never think of what they'll do for me.

That is a rare quality in this day and age.
curlypearl likes this.
FroZen
^^ I agree, which is why white males don't need to identify as such because no one ever refers to them as part of a group. They're just individuals.

Must be nice.
Originally Posted by annabananalise
LoL!

But someone said what really defines us is what sets us apart. Well. I guess mine would be I care about others. Many have stopped( or never did) to do so. When I do things for others I never think of what they'll do for me.

That is a rare quality in this day and age.
Originally Posted by BlackAngelPlayah
Cool, but that's totally not what I'm going for in the thread.
No MAS.

I am the new Black.

"Hope the Mail are saving space tomorrow for Samantha Brick's reaction piece on the reactions to her piece about the reactions to her piece." ~ Tweet reposted by Rou.

http://www.youtube.com/user/Kimshi4242

http://www.tumblr.com/blog/kimshi4242
I'm not sure I understand what you were looking for. I kinda guessed like everyone else. '

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using CurlTalk App
curlypearl likes this.
Maybe I didn't get it right either. I listed groups that I identify myself as, am comfortable with, think of as part of myself, are important to me.
greenjumper likes this.
In Western PA
Found NC in 2004. CG since 2-05, going grey since 9-05. 3B with some 3A.
Hair texture-medium/fine, porosity-normal except for the ends which are porous, elasticity-normal.
Suave & VO5 cond, LA Looks Sport Gel, oils, honey, vinegar.
http://public.fotki.com/jeepcurlygurl/ password jeepy **updated Feb 2014**
https://www.facebook.com/lifetheuniverseandtodd
I wonder if men were asked the same question if they would feel the need to identify as "Man". Most of the replies listed being a "woman". Sort of like how it seems like most people don't need to identify as being white. Or how ( I don't think) any heterosexuals identified as such while some homosexuals did. I find that interesting! I guess some things are considered "default" to the point where they don't need to be distinguished and not having to worry about that part of your identity be as much of a heavy influence on your life in a positive or negative way.
Originally Posted by greenjumper
Heterosexual women will identify as wives/mothers though, and many of us did (or girlfriend.) Of course, homosexual women can be all those things too, but I know for me as a heterosexual woman, the act of conceiving, carrying, bearing my children and raising them with my husband is very much a part of my sexuality and my identity.
Originally Posted by Amneris
Soo...I definitely understand identifying yourself as a mother but I don't understand the wife part. Is it really all that different?? I would never identify myself as being a gf, even when I was in a really long relationship.
Originally Posted by Josephine
Interesting. On the one hand, your spousal relationship is supposed to be your most important relationship (at least in my world view). So I can see wanting to honor that relationship by including that relationship as part of your identity.

But it's not like I felt any special kinship or bond w/ other "wives" (when I was married) or that I felt I was losing membership in a group when I stopped being married. And it's not like I took on a new set of attributes when I became a wife. I was still essentially the same person, as a person.

I guess marriage or "partnership" or whatever relates to a very siginificant relationship that we would want to honor. But IDK that it changed me so deeply that it's one of the top things I identify with.

I mean, if I am dating Bob for a year and then we break up...has my identity radically changed? Then I am alone and I start dating Mike, am I changed as a human being again. Say I date Mike for 10 years, and then one day decide to marry him...have I changed who I am again? Then we get separated but still have sex and go to the movies occasionally, am I someone else? Personally, I think not.
3b (with 3c tendencies) on modified CG


Last edited by spiderlashes5000; 03-22-2013 at 02:15 PM.
I think the point is the different things different people feel defines themselves. The point here is that one person would define themselves one way while another would define themselves another.

You (gy) don't have to understand or agree that a relationship defines another person, it does to them.

This doesn't seem to be the type of topic that is debated.


Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using CurlTalk App
Amneris likes this.
Hmmm, ok yeah, I should've explained better. When I say "identity," I mean something deeper than fashionista (no shade). For the most part, I'm looking for how you define yourself as a human being, and that's probably based on traits that are either immutable or somehow center on deeply held principles and values. I'm not just looking for groups that you belong to for the moment.
Originally Posted by The New Black
I'm not sure I understand what you were looking for. I kinda guessed like everyone else. '

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using CurlTalk App
Originally Posted by iroc
Hope that clarifies?
No MAS.

I am the new Black.

"Hope the Mail are saving space tomorrow for Samantha Brick's reaction piece on the reactions to her piece about the reactions to her piece." ~ Tweet reposted by Rou.

http://www.youtube.com/user/Kimshi4242

http://www.tumblr.com/blog/kimshi4242
Hmmm, ok yeah, I should've explained better. When I say "identity," I mean something deeper than fashionista (no shade). For the most part, I'm looking for how you define yourself as a human being, and that's probably based on traits that are either immutable or somehow center on deeply held principles and values. I'm not just looking for groups that you belong to for the moment.
Originally Posted by The New Black
I'm not sure I understand what you were looking for. I kinda guessed like everyone else. '

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using CurlTalk App
Originally Posted by iroc
Hope that clarifies?
Originally Posted by The New Black
Oh, cause you told BAP that what she said wasn't what you were looking for so I got confused.

Sorry! Carry on.


Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using CurlTalk App

Trending Topics


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2011 NaturallyCurly.com