View Poll Results: Would you/did you get a pregnancy HIV test?
Yes 38 88.37%
No 4 9.30%
No, but I wish I had 0 0%
I don't know if I would 1 2.33%
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll

If you are/were pregnant, do you HIV test?

I was reading this article about HIV testing for pregnant women:

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/APW...D8B4TJ6G0.html

I was surprised since my midwifes include an HIV test in the regular testing line up, although they do have an additional consent form. I can't imagine not getting this. Even if you are sure there is no chance you could have HIV, wouldn't you want to get this test out of respect for the people helping you give birth? They are probably going to get your blood on them, it seems only polite to let them know what they are dealing with.

I don't understand why there is such a stigma about a test that could eventually save your baby's life, and put your doctor and nurses at ease....
3c, CG Fine hairs, med growth.
Formerly "Rainyday"
When I was pregnant, the doctors added the test to the list of other blood tests that I needed to take. I have always had an HIV test done annually, along with my regular exam, so I didn't bat an eyelash at the request. (I've never been at high risk, I'm just paranoid.)

Along with the reasons that you stated, it is also very important because the care for the newborn will be different if the mother is HIV positive. Breastfeeding, for example, is contraindicated to the mother's positive HIV status.

My mom was a neonatal nurse in a General Hospital. She said that they had lots of non-English speaking mothers giving birth without prenatal care of any kind. The doctors didn't know the mother's HIV status or if she was otherwise healthy. They knew even less about the infant, like if it was full-term or not. Can you imagine?!
No... I wouldn't need one since my husband and I were both virgins until we got married and we trust that neither has broken our vows, so there'd be no point.
Get used to me. Black, confident, cocky; my name, not yours; my religion, not yours; my goals, my own; get used to me. -Muhammad Ali











I am pregnant and I did not have a choice but to take the test. It was part of my routine blood tests taken on my first visit. It did not bother me though. I am not at high risk but it only takes once. I would want the best care for my child and if knowing my status helps, I'm all for it.

mini-album w/ various styles for the past 10 years of natural hair:
http://s29.photobucket.com/albums/c252/wavezncurlz/hair/
password: curlzorwavez
My vote is spilt between yes and I don't know.
Should I? Yes.
Would I really want to? Not at all.
I'm a 2something/3something. Started modified CG routine on 6/6/05
Cut more than ten inches from my BSL hair on 8-10-05 and growing it long again
But we're STILL adjusting.
I think it is automatic in most situations now. So many people lie, or are unaware that they could have contracted it that they test anyway. Personally, I say if it could help protect the baby, or at the very least make the attending physician feel better about the care given - then by all means - and I am a total needle phobe.
Better everyone think your a fool, than to open your mouth and prove them right.

Perception is not reality.

http://public.fotki.com/hmiklos
I'm with Three Rivers Curly, I was certain this was a routine screen now. I can't understand why anyone active during the dawn of HIV/AIDS and beyond wouldn't. Half the problem is people not knowing they have the disease since it can lie undetectable for awhile.

(Getting pregnant cured me of any needle phobia I might have had. It was either suck it up or hyperventilate everytime -- couldn't be good for the baby )
3c representative of a 2c-4a curly clan.
Keeping it simple, natural & sulfate free. Fan of pure oils, butters & glycerin to moisturize.
I am pregnant and I did not have a choice but to take the test. It was part of my routine blood tests taken on my first visit. It did not bother me though. I am not at high risk but it only takes once. I would want the best care for my child and if knowing my status helps, I'm all for it.
Originally Posted by wavezncurlz
me too
I had it done with the other blood tests, but I did have to sign a consent form. This was not really an issue for m e, since I had teh HIV test done when I was in the Army and am very low risk. It's good to get just in case though.
my blog
I think it is automatic in most situations now. So many people lie, or are unaware that they could have contracted it that they test anyway. Personally, I say if it could help protect the baby, or at the very least make the attending physician feel better about the care given - then by all means - and I am a total needle phobe.
Originally Posted by three rivers curly
Totally agree. I had to have one regualarly when I was on the ship as part of my medical...definatly no biggie. I really can't understand why someone wouldn't?
I believe in manicures. I believe in overdressing. I believe in primping at leisure and wearing lipstick. I believe in pink. I believe that laughing is the best calorie burner. I believe in kissing, kissing a lot. I believe in being strong when everything seems to be going wrong. I believe that happy girls are the prettiest girls. I believe that tomorrow is another day and I believe in miracles.
Audrey Hepburn
I got a test last year due to a cheating boyfriend so, yeah, I wouldn't have a problem getting one if I were pregnant.


Obamacare is not a blueprint for socialism. You're thinking of the New Testament. ~~ John Fugelsang



I had it done when I was pregnant w/ Bets even though I knew I was okay & DH was okay (being military he's tested regularly). I figured they were already taking 6 vials of blood that day so what was one more??
Slinky's rule for NC.com:

I suppose I can't judge you because you married a serviceman and it is wartime. Boo hoo. You must be loney sitting at home with nothing else to do but pick on people. Why don't you go masterbate again?
I had it done routinely also when I was pregnant. I don't see why you wouldn't.
To Trenell, MizKerri and geeky:
I pray none of you ever has to live in a communist state.

Geeky is my hero. She's the true badass. The badass who doesn't even need to be a badass. There aren't enough O's in cool to describe her.
(Getting pregnant cured me of any needle phobia I might have had. It was either suck it up or hyperventilate everytime -- couldn't be good for the baby )
Originally Posted by Enrica
Somehow, I didn't have a problem with needles when it came time for the drugs during contractions .
Better everyone think your a fool, than to open your mouth and prove them right.

Perception is not reality.

http://public.fotki.com/hmiklos
The test is no more invasive than your routine blood test. I don't understand why there would be a problem with getting the test done. Even though I knew there was no way I was HIV positive, I never hesitated at getting it done. It was simply something that was part of my prenatal workup.
No... I wouldn't need one since my husband and I were both virgins until we got married and we trust that neither has broken our vows, so there'd be no point.
Originally Posted by Amneris
You and your husband know in your case, but do you know how many times medical professionals are told that and it's not true? It's good information for them to know for certain.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with being tested. Give your doctor and nurses peace of mind, IMO.
________
PRILOSEC SIDE EFFECTS

Last edited by goldencurly; 08-30-2011 at 08:36 AM.
No... I wouldn't need one since my husband and I were both virgins until we got married and we trust that neither has broken our vows, so there'd be no point.
Originally Posted by Amneris
You and your husband know in your case, but do you know how many times medical professionals are told that and it's not true? It's good information for them to know for certain.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with being tested. Give your doctor and nurses peace of mind, IMO.
Originally Posted by goldencurly
Amneris and Goldencurly, sexual transmission is not the only way HIV is transmitted. So being a virgin and not breaking vows has nothing to do with anything. It's better to KNOW than to assume, no matter how wonderful you think your relationship is.
The test is no more invasive than your routine blood test. I don't understand why there would be a problem with getting the test done. Even though I knew there was no way I was HIV positive, I never hesitated at getting it done. It was simply something that was part of my prenatal workup.
Originally Posted by medussa
It was part of mine as well. And they do it now, because if caught early enough, they can actually give you drugs/inhibitors to PREVENT the virus from going to the baby.

I am going to GUESS that people would have a problem with getting an HIV test because they A) don't want to hear that they have it, B) if they are faithful, it must mean that their partner wasn't, C) that they aren't practicing safe sex or didn't in the past. All of these assumptions can make people feel like their privacy is being nterfered with. AGAIN, just ASSUMING. My HIV tests were part of my prenatal blood work up...and ONLY my doctor can tell me the results of that test. No one else even has access to it.
It's not routine with my midwife but I consented. I knew there was no chance (had never even had surgery in my life) but I saw it as a peace of mind sort of thing.

Trending Topics


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2011 NaturallyCurly.com