Go Back   CurlTalk > Life > Politics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-20-2011, 12:45 PM   #1
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 481
Question Romney for President?

I probably will never support a Republican for president, but this will be my first time since I began voting (2004 - I was eligible in 2000, but didn't care at that time.) that I will not support a Dem. I likely won't vote at all. I'm disappointed in Obama, and in Congress, too. I was ambivalent toward him in the first place, and didn't think he'd do anything. I don't think anyone can "save" us from bad economic times, but I think he could've done more on some issues that were under his control.

Romney is the only candidate that appeals to me out of the Republicans so far. I'm lately more conservative on economic issues. On social issues, my main one is that I'm a strong environmentalist - I see a new side to it. Romney comes from the most progressive state, environmentally, plus I believe if we take people off SSI (not everyone) that don't belong on it in the first place and stop showering people with food stamps like it's Mardi Gras, maybe people will stop having kids they can't afford. Our governor is doing this in Ohio, and it's one of the few things he does that I support. Yes, I do care how many kids people have when I have to pay for them, and natural resources are decreasing and rising in price. I work for a lawyer who does bankruptcy, and recently a woman came in who has had a heart issue since birth and claimed she couldn't work, yet she has two kids, that she is getting govt. money for. I definitely don't believe in doing away with SSI, but we can't support everyone and thrive as a country! We are competing against countries who have a survival of the fittest mantra, as life was designed to be.

Therefore, this Democrat is keeping an open mind in this upcoming election. Romney makes the most sense, IMO, because he has the business sense to make cuts in the right areas, not take scissors to everything like my gov. is doing. I do think a Republican will have a hard time beating Obama. States like OH and FL, huge battleground states, are regretting electing Rep governors in 2010.

I think it will be a Pawlenty-ish Republican if we elect a Rep. For some reason, anyone running from the northeast is assumed to be a closet liberal (though as I said above is a positive to me). People in the midwest and south generally care about gluttony, money, doing nothing or worse, doing stuff they can't afford - they're largely dunderheads, essentially (Sorry, but it's true.). The Mormon factor is an issue too, but most people I hear from would rather have someone who believes in something, who is seen worshipping at least semi-regularly rather than someone like Obama who is half-hearted at best about his religious views. *That is not my opinion,* but the general feeling relayed from my fellow midwestern dunderheads. I personally don't care about a presidential candidate's religion unless extreme views start coming out, or he/she starts oppressing people with religion.

What are your feelings about Romney, and do you think he can win, regardless of your stance?

I meant to add a poll, but I guess I can't now. I'll add one here:

Would you support Mitt Romney for President, and what is your opinion of his candidacy?

A. I'd vote for him, and I think he'd beat Obama.

B. I'd vote for him, but I don't think he'd beat Obama.

C. I wouldn't support him, and I don't think he'd win (against Obama.).

D. I wouldn't support him, but I think he'd win (against Obama).

E. I'm not voting and don't care either way.

Last edited by AllyT; 04-20-2011 at 12:52 PM.
AllyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 04:03 PM   #2
 
Poodlehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 9,278
Default

Just curious, what do you know about Pawlenty?
__________________
Minneapolis, MN
Poodlehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 04:20 PM   #3
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 481
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poodlehead View Post
Just curious, what do you know about Pawlenty?
Answer my question first.

OK, I'll go ahead and answer. I know enough about Pawlenty to know he isn't the type of candidate I'm likely to support. He struck a chord with me when he pardoned a sex offender who went on to rape his daughter. Pretty despicable. From what my mother has said, who keeps up on everything political, Pawlenty is borderline teaparty, possibly closet teaparty, which is a major turnoff. He hasn't done anything for me yet - let's put it that way. I haven't examined any of the likely Republican candidates closely yet as I'm 90% sure I won't vote for one. And, only 1 has made a declaration that he'll run.

Romney is the only Republican candidate so far to spark my interest. What do you think about him, Poodlehead?
AllyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 06:43 PM   #4
 
Poodlehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 9,278
Default

I guess I don't know enough about Romney to know whether I like him or not. These days, there are very few Republicans I like or trust. They are all trying to court the Tea Party, so they are painting themselves as being incredibly conservative, whether they are or not. Pawlenty cut funding for a lot of social services in Minnesota, and still left us in the red. He is playing the Tea Party game in hopes it will get him votes. Their love of Michele Bachmann has stunned him and he's scrambling to catch up.

Of the current field of Republicans, I don't see a single one I would be willing to vote for. And at this point, I would not vote for Obama either.
__________________
Minneapolis, MN
Poodlehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 08:05 PM   #5
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,547
Default

If I were going to vote for a Republican, it would be Mitch Daniels or Tim Pawlenty. Both from the midwest and seem to emphasize the fiscal over the social.

I'd love to see anyone, Dem or Rep, work to create jobs and reduce the debt. It would be fine with me if gay marriage, abortion, and other non-fiscal issues never came up.

I want the prez and congress to raise the social security age, create a higher co-pay for Medicare recipients in the year 2021, eliminate medicaid for adults, and eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse.
Myradella3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 08:41 PM   #6
 
RedCatWaves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 31,609
Default

Gay marriage, abortion, women's rights, guns, etc...will never be non-issues for Republicans. It's become too deeply entrenched in the politics. They live for the social issues...that's what gets them the votes because most people ignore fiscal issues unless the economy seems to be doing poorly...and Reps will legislate their version of our morality whenever they are in office.

We already raised the social security age...back in the early 80's, we raised the age to receive full retirement benefits to 67 for folks born after 1960. I don't know how much older you think we can go, considering that poorer folks...the very people who need the benefits...have much lower life expectancy than rich folks and are mostly dead by 67. Or maybe that was your point...to cut benefits for poor folks, but let the rich folks have full benefits.

http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/91xx/doc9...ancy_Brief.pdf

Pawlenty is a woman hater. Romney is a cult-member (mormon) and America won't be electing a mormon anytime soon. The Rep pool is looking pretty dim.
RedCatWaves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 06:25 AM   #7
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,547
Default

I'd leave the top age at 70 but instead of being able to draw benefits at age 62, I set it at 65. Instead of three age points (62, 65, and 70), there would just be two. Not being an actuary, I can't say how much difference that would make but it's a starting point.

I'm not a fan of any of the Republican candidates, but just as Obama is not wholly perfect, they are not wholly imperfect.

I've worked in Head Start in three states. It's the first program I'd cut. Could it replaced with something effective? Sure and I hope that would happen but it's a horribly ineffective system, at least where I've lived.
Myradella3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 12:39 PM   #8
 
eche428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 2,324
Default

I guess I'm too much of a dunderhead to be able to answer.
__________________
< member since 2006. No idea where 1969 came from.
eche428 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 01:12 PM   #9
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 481
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eche428 View Post
I guess I'm too much of a dunderhead to be able to answer.
Oh good grief. I've lived in the midwest my whole life. I call it as I see it.... I have the midwestern dunderhead mentality about many if not most things, myself. Feel free to answer, if you have something to add. Dunderheads welcome.
AllyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 01:33 PM   #10
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 481
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Myradella3 View Post
I'd leave the top age at 70 but instead of being able to draw benefits at age 62, I set it at 65. Instead of three age points (62, 65, and 70), there would just be two. Not being an actuary, I can't say how much difference that would make but it's a starting point.

I'm not a fan of any of the Republican candidates, but just as Obama is not wholly perfect, they are not wholly imperfect.

I've worked in Head Start in three states. It's the first program I'd cut. Could it replaced with something effective? Sure and I hope that would happen but it's a horribly ineffective system, at least where I've lived.
I don't know about Head Start, but education cuts in my state have been wildly unpopular, especially in my family with my dad being a professor at a public college. I heard rumors that public colleges were raising tuition and asking profs to take less hours. My dad told me out of the blue one day that he wants to retire next year. He's going to be 62 and never talked about retirement before. I just don't think of 62 as being that old any more. Maybe it is all his choice, but he always goes on about how much he loves to work. I'm guessing it has something to do with the cuts. Since he is a loyal Republican, he'll never say. He's been there since 1991, and I just never thought they'd go after his job.

It is scary how some of these political decisions are starting to hit close to home. I'm not following the union battle at all, but that is still raging in Ohio and I'm guessing, WI. I thought it was over, but I guess they're trying to repeal now. That is said to be a major blow to (Republican) Kasich if it goes through. He's cutting industries like healthcare and local universities that are literally the only industries we have left! I don't know how the local colleges have done as well as they have, but they always have strong enrollment.

Polls show most people in Ohio regret bringing a Repiblican in. This is reflected nationally in battleground states with new Rep. govs. This all is definitely going to affect any Republican candidate in 2012. I can't say yet whether that will be a good thing or not (depends on who runs). I'm with you, Myradella - my trust of Reps has never been high, and I can't help but let state politics affect how I feel about national candidates.
AllyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2011, 09:09 AM   #11
 
Boomygrrl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,910
Default

I will probably hesitantly vote for Obama again. I was a Hilary Clinton supporter. I see Obama as the lesser of all the evils. He's a nice enough guy and I like many of the issues he had stood for...but Obama and the Democratic Party are tooooo nice. The Repubs (as much as I disagree with most/not all of the issues they stand for) at least fight hard. They can be total a-holes about things...and guess what? we need more Democratic a-holes.

With that said...if I had to vote Republican...Romney does look like the best candidate, so far. But really, that isn't saying much. The other unofficial contenders seem like a joke to me...they really do.
__________________
That's right, I said it! I wear scrunchies!!

I am a sulfate washing, cone slabbing, curly lovin' s.o.b. The CG police haven't caught me yet.


3a/3b
Boomygrrl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2011, 12:21 PM   #12
 
gemini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,842
Default

I think the social security cap should be raised but I know that won't be a popular solution.
gemini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2011, 01:26 PM   #13
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 481
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boomygrrl View Post
With that said...if I had to vote Republican...Romney does look like the best candidate, so far. But really, that isn't saying much. The other unofficial contenders seem like a joke to me...they really do.
Yeah, I don't think the extreme Tea Partiers like Palin or Bachmann are going anywhere. For one, this country has a problem with women in power, as evidenced by the '08 election. The media is going to play on those fears AGAIN to get their man re-elected (in the case of a female Repub candidate). I was a Clinton supporter in '08, and was so totally disgusted with how the media handled the women candidates that I almost didn't vote.

Bachmann is no dummy - I have to admire anyone who practices tax law. But, she needs to brush up on U.S. history. She can't keep making errors when the Tea Party is supposed to be all about the Constitution and, apparently, bringing up historical events. I'm still unsure of what the Tea Party is supposed to be all about...

Anyway, women policians are almost always thrown into one of two piles. We all know what those are. I wish Bachmann and Palin would get better handlers or... something. They remind me of Dean - they have no self-control, though Palin is getting better with the media. Bachmann may run, but they're both probably going to end up putting their allegiance behind a less extreme Tea Party candidate. Bachmann seems quite radical for a Minnesotan.

Last edited by AllyT; 04-23-2011 at 01:32 PM.
AllyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2011, 01:49 PM   #14
 
Eilonwy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 12,124
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AllyT View Post
Bachmann is no dummy - I have to admire anyone who practices tax law.
She just compared paying taxes to the Holocaust. Not as hyperbole or an a fortiori argument, but saying that they're equivalent.
Eilonwy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2011, 03:10 PM   #15
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 481
Default

Just because she made a stupid comment doesn't mean she's a stupid person. I said she has a big mouth that she can't keep under control, and that will be her downfall.

I do wish politicians would leave Jews and the Holocaust alone - I don't know what the fad is with bringing that up.
AllyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2011, 03:57 PM   #16
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 31
Default

The Republican base hates the healthcare bill that was passed in '09, or what they like to call it: "Obamacare". That was based on his healthcare plan in MA. Due to that I highly doubt he'll even be a front runner in the GOP primary. His adversaries would definately use that bit against him, and probably successfully succeed in doing so.

I don't know if I'd support him though. If he's like any of the other typical GOP members in Congress who want tax cuts for the rich, cut unemployment, abolish Roe V Wade, etc. then no.
Plisskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2011, 03:23 PM   #17
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 481
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Plisskin View Post
The Republican base hates the healthcare bill that was passed in '09, or what they like to call it: "Obamacare". That was based on his healthcare plan in MA. Due to that I highly doubt he'll even be a front runner in the GOP primary. His adversaries would definately use that bit against him, and probably successfully succeed in doing so.

I don't know if I'd support him though. If he's like any of the other typical GOP members in Congress who want tax cuts for the rich, cut unemployment, abolish Roe V Wade, etc. then no.
He spoke on his healthcare plan today at 2:00. I missed it because I'm at work, so I don't know what he said. He was to explain the differences b/w his plan and Obama's, and why it is a myth that Obama's plan was based on his.

I think just about any reasonable Republican could beat Obama at this point. I used to not think that, but the economy is so bad, the environment is so bad which is going to greatly pull on the economy. The U.S. trend of computerizing jobs and sending jobs overseas is catching up, and companies are still doing these things at the same or higher rates b/c they're struggling. They don't get that if you cut everyone on the bottom, it's going to bottom out from under you. People don't get that the economy is transitive, and that no one has the "right" answers or can make the "right" choices.

There are a lot of dangerous trends going on that are either unstoppable or out of control. It's going to be tough for many if not the majority of Americans - I will say it whether it is popular on not to say b/c ignoring doesn't work. I think some heavy, unpopular legislation would have to put in play to stop the trainwreck at this point, and no one will do it. A Republican can't or won't stop it, but the odds will greatly favor a Repub becoming President, regardless.
AllyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2011, 06:19 AM   #18
 
misspam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,192
Default

As a conservative, I would not vote for Romney in the primary. Now if he won the nomination, I would do what I did when I voted for McCain - close my eyes, hold my nose, pull the lever, and go home and take a shower.

Anyone but Mitt......
__________________
misspam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2011, 09:35 AM   #19
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 481
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by misspam View Post
As a conservative, I would not vote for Romney in the primary. Now if he won the nomination, I would do what I did when I voted for McCain - close my eyes, hold my nose, pull the lever, and go home and take a shower.

Anyone but Mitt......
He is a conservative, or else, he identifies that way. What makes you think he is not? I don't think instituting a healthcare plan his state makes him a liberal. MA is very different from the U.S. as a whole, and I know he gets it wouldn't work for the U.S.

I don't think caring about the environment makes him a liberal. I don't know that he personally does, but his state has the best environmental record. We're screwed as far as that goes, but if the principles are there, the record is there, it makes me feel better about the candidate as a human being. An issue like that shouldn't have a thing to do with liberalism/conservatism.

I'm sure some people have an issue with his religion because he's heads above other candidates in the polls, it seems to be his time, but Repubs hesitate to make him the frontrunner. Why?
AllyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2011, 03:44 PM   #20
 
misspam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AllyT View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by misspam View Post
As a conservative, I would not vote for Romney in the primary. Now if he won the nomination, I would do what I did when I voted for McCain - close my eyes, hold my nose, pull the lever, and go home and take a shower.

Anyone but Mitt......
He is a conservative, or else, he identifies that way. What makes you think he is not? I don't think instituting a healthcare plan his state makes him a liberal. MA is very different from the U.S. as a whole, and I know he gets it wouldn't work for the U.S.

I don't think caring about the environment makes him a liberal. I don't know that he personally does, but his state has the best environmental record. We're screwed as far as that goes, but if the principles are there, the record is there, it makes me feel better about the candidate as a human being. An issue like that shouldn't have a thing to do with liberalism/conservatism.

I'm sure some people have an issue with his religion because he's heads above other candidates in the polls, it seems to be his time, but Repubs hesitate to make him the frontrunner. Why?
He can identify himself however he chooses but in no way does his record classify him as a conservative. He is a big-government Republican. That's where the lack of enthusiasm is coming from, in my opinion.

I don't put much stock in early polls. It's way too early in the game for that.
__________________
misspam is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Trending Topics[-]hide

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2011 NaturallyCurly.com