I have a "proven pelvis" so it's a good possibility to deliver this baby vaginally, but DS was by Caesarian 4 years ago, and I'd rather not deal with the recovery and long term issues again at this stage in my life.
Wondering if the VBAC was a better recovery and if you had a vaginal birth before c- section ( like I did) how the two compared to each other.
My friends is supposed to be having a VBAC in about a month (fingers crossed), I will ask her provided it goes well.
FWIW, I have heard both anectodally and read generally that subsequent c-sections are more complex as far as both the surgery and the recovery, jut because working around the existing scar tissue is tougher and does not heal as well
To Trenell, MizKerri and geeky:
I pray none of you ever has to live in a communist state.
Geeky is my hero. She's the true badass. The badass who doesn't even need to be a badass. There aren't enough O's in cool to describe her.
I had a vbac. My c-section was due to my pelvis being too small-supposedly. I went on to have a larger baby vaginally. The vbac is so much easier especially when you have another child to care for (I had 2 under 2).
Would have a vbac all over again.
@rcw. At 32weeks DS was in distress due to chylothorax and I had to have emergency csection .
Yes, my OB is supportive as well as the maternal fetal specialist for VBAC
Yikes. Poor guy.
No, that doesn't sound like a repeatable problem.
I think all women should at least try VBAC with subsequent babies after c-sections. You really have nothing to lose, and you have a LOT to gain (easier, less-painful recovery, healthier mom and baby). Laboring doesn't increase recovery time if you do happen to need another c-sec. With your proven pelvis, your chances of having a successful VBAC are pretty darn high. Just don't let them induce you, or augment your labor with pitocin or other drugs.
Good luck! I have had 3 csections and have scheduled a 4th with the one I am pregnant with now, because after 3 surgery births no Dr around here will attempt a vbac! It was hard enough to get someone to try after 1!
I did go all out and try for a vbac with #2. I hired doulas with vbac expertise and traveled over an hour away to go to the most vbac friendly dr around. But alas, son #2 had different plans and I was 10 days overdue and out of fluid and baby was in distress so we went with the csection. I am so happy I tried though, no "what ifs" ya know?
I wish you the best of luck, from what I have heard and seen natural births look a lot better than the surgical way
I will say, for me, csections 2 and 3 were a lot easier than #1. I suppose that is because #1 was after 20 hours of labor with pitocin and I was cut with only my old epidural to numb me so I felt the incision and had to be knocked out with dilaudid. With #2 and #3 I had a spinal and no labor and recovery was quicker and easier than with #1.
Sent from my Ally using CurlTalk App
*mama to 3 little boys and a 4th due in early March
*3a shoulder length curls
*experimenting with the CG method
Last edited by RobinP92202; 09-15-2011 at 05:35 PM.
I've had c-secs with labor and without labor first, and there was no difference in terms of recovery pain or recovery time. I was told it would be "easier" by the doctor who did my 2nd c-sec (as a way to convince me to just-do-the-surgery), but it really wasn't easier, and I felt deceived afterwards when it hurt just as much.