I truly believe at least half if not most men who are anti choice are not really about preserving life but controlling a woman's body.
Originally Posted by Josephine
In this case both the woman and the child are the man's property. The woman can't have an abortion because she's the vessel for the man's fetal property. And later, when the child property displeases the man, he can dispose of it.

I don't understand how someone who's pro-life could seriously propose this.
Originally Posted by The New Black
He's not pro-life. He just feels very strongly about property rights.

Last edited by Eilonwy; 10-09-2012 at 07:44 PM.